Destiny Lopez
Professor Allyson Hobbes
Research Seminar
Professor Allyson Hobbes
Research Seminar
Chicano Park Title
San Diego, California is a popular tourist destination famous
for its beautiful weather, pristine beaches, and prominent landmarks, such as
the iconic Coronado Bridge that connects San Diego to Coronado Island. However,
located underneath the Coronado Bridge is another landmark that represents a
side of San Diego that often goes unseen by tourists. Directly underneath the
bridge, you can find handball courts, lowrider car shows, and dozens of brightly-colored
murals painted onto the bridge’s pillars. Chicano
Park is located in the heart of Barrio Logan, a historically Mexican-American
working class neighborhood. In addition to housing the largest outdoor display
of murals in the world (citation
needed), Chicano Park’s unique location underneath a bridge makes it a
major San Diego landmark and designated historic site.
Chicano Park was established in
1970, after a group of local activists and community members “took over” land
that was intended to become a highway patrol station (citation needed). The park represented the
struggle to reclaim Chicano space during a period in which Barrio Logan was
facing numerous threats. At the time of the Chicano Park takeover,
Barrio Logan had just been rezoned into an industrial zone, and residents
worried that the neighborhood would be overtaken by junkyards (cite). [DL1] Residents also opposed the creation of a highway patrol station in
their community, particularly on land that was promised by the city to become a
community park (cite).
In addition to these local
motivations, some of the Chicano Park activists viewed the takeover as aligning
with the political consciousness of the larger Chicano Movement. The takeover
occurred during the height of the Chicano Movement in California, and many of
the Chicano Park activists drew inspiration from the movement. In particular,
activists viewed the takeover of the park as a reclamation of Aztlan – the legendary
home of the Aztecs which had been colonized by Europeans. By analyzing
newspapers, film footage, music, and the art of Chicano Park itself, I will reveal
that Chicano Park activists were motivated by both concrete, local concerns and
more symbolic notions drawn from the Chicano Movement. I will begin by
outlining the threats to Barrio Logan at the time, and how the takeover of the
park was an effective form of grassroots resistance to those threats. I will then
demonstrate the ways in which Chicano Park activists connected their
neighborhood struggle to the larger political consciousness of the Chicano
Movement. Finally, I will argue that these were not competing visions, but in
fact complimentary visions that toward the same goal of reclaiming Chicano
space in the face of injustices.
Historic Context of the Chicano Movement in San Diego and
California (part three)
The Chicano Park takeover occurred
during a time of heightened Chicano consciousness in San Diego, and the United
States as a whole. Just five years before the takeover, the United Farm Workers,
led by prominent activists Cesar Chavez and Dolores Huerta, staged a grape
growers strike, marking a major event in the Chicano Movement. This, along with
other movements for civil rights occurring across the country, galvanized a new
generation of young, college-age Chicanos to take action and adopt a growing
political consciousness (Ortiz 132) They formed such groups as the Movimiento
Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlan (MEChA), La Raza Unida Party, and the Brown
Berets (to which many Chicano Park activists belonged). These national events
inspired students to bring the Chicano movement to their communities.
In San Diego, student activists drew
on the movement to implement change at their universities. In 1968, Chicano
students at San Diego State University (SDSU) campaigned for the creation of a
Mexican-American Studies department, which became the first of its kind in the
United States (Ortiz 131). These new courses in Mexican-American studies offered
narratives that departed from the dominant, often white-washed narrative often
taught in classrooms, providing students with a decolonial perspective on
history. As student activists worked to make their campuses more inclusive,
they remained connected to the larger movement happening across California and
the nation. Many students from San Diego traveled to Chicano Liberation Youth
Conference in Denver, where the notion of Aztlan was first introduce and became
crucial to the San Diego Chicano movement (Ortiz 132).
The concept of Aztlan was introduced in 1969
and became a central tenant of the Chicano Movement. At the Chicano Liberation
Youth Conference, attended by San Diego students, students released “El Plan
Espiritual de Aztlan,” the document that first put forth the notion of Aztlan
as a colonized Chicano territory that includes land on both sides of the
border. “El Plan” outlines the need for Chicanos to reclaim Aztlan and assert
their right to self-determination (cite el plan). The notion of Aztlan became prominent in the
Chicano movement, along with the impulse to reclaim Chicano and indigenous
space north of the border. As Gloria Anzaldua wrote of the California border
region in Borderlands, La Frontera: The
New Mestiza, “This land was Mexican once, was Indian always and is. And
will be again” (cite).
San Diego, a border city with a substantial Chicano population and politicized
student population, was strongly impacted by this consciousness. The notions of
reclaiming Aztlan and asserting Chicano self-determination figured prominently
in San Diego activism, and in the creation of Chicano Park.
Analysis of Chicano Park Song
“Chicano Park Samba” is a song released in 1979 by the group Los
Alacranes Mojados, or the Wetback Scorpions. The group was led by Ramon
Sanchez, who was involved in farm workers’ rights in the 1970s as well as being
involved in the Chicano Park takeover in 1970. (cite). The song tells the story
of Chicano Park, and highlights the sense of community pride in the struggle to
take back the space underneath the bridge. It reflects the local vision of
creating a park for the community in place of a highway patrol station. It also
connects the takeover of Chicano Park to the greater Chicano Movement,
demonstrating the way in which Chicano Park activists saw the park is a
significant not just for Barrio Logan, but an important event in the struggle
for Chicano self-determination.
The song suggests that the immediate
importance of the park was the sense of community it would bring to Barrio
Logan. According to the song, Barrio Logan residents wanted “a park where all
the little chavalitos could play in / So they wouldn’t have to play in the
street” and where “all the familias could come, / And just get together on a
Sunday afternoon.” (cite). The concern for community building in Barrio Logan
was most likely heightened in 1970, since the rezoning of the neighborhood
threatened to change the composition of Barrio Logan to a residential, family
community to an industrial zone. In this context, a neighborhood park would be
an effective way to resist changes to the neighborhood’s composition, since it
could serve as a community gathering space.
“Chicano Park Samba” portrays the
Chicano takeover as a way for Barrio Logan residents to use civil disobedience
to hold their government accountable for actions that harmed the community. The
residents of Barrio Logan had little power over the changes that were occurring
in their community, from the building of Coronado Bridge to the rezoning of
their neighborhood (find
evidence). Rather than respond to the community’s demand for a park, the
city said “Chale, we’re going to make a highway patrol station here” (site the
song). When the city chose to build a highway patrol station without informing
the community or allowing them a say in the process, the takeover providing an
avenue through which to oppose government actions that were damaging to the community.
In “Chicano Park Samba,” Sanchez portrays the takeover as a bold act of civil
disobedience:
“And they walked on the land,
And they took it over with their picks and their shovels,
And they began to build their park.”
And they took it over with their picks and their shovels,
And they began to build their park.”
In the
absence of formal mechanisms for resisting threats to their neighborhood, the
community had to turn to civil disobedience. The unsanctioned takeover and
creation of the park proved to be the most effective – and perhaps only – way
that the community could combat the presence of a highway patrol station.
The song makes the connection
between the fight for a park in San Diego and the larger Chicano struggle. The
final lines of the song, “Que vivan, que vivan, los barrios unidos,” which
means “long live, long live, the united barrios,” signify a sense of unity and
solidarity among all Chicano communities. This suggests that the victory for
Barrio Logan was a shared victory for “los barrios unidos,” and the greater
Chicano struggle. Additionally, the description of the activists who “walked on
the land” with “their picks and their shovels” alludes to reclaiming and that
once belonged to Chicanos and indigenous people of the area.
Outline
1. Introduction
a.
Background information on
Barrio Logan and takeover
b.
Thesis
2. Threats to Barrio Logan
a.
Rezoning of neighborhood +
junkyards
b.
Effect of bridges and highways
on neighborhoods of color
c.
Problematic effect of building
highway patrol station in community of color
3. Vision for Chicano Park as tool to combat these local threats
a.
Varrio si, Yonkes no mural
analysis
b.
Way to reclaim “spatial trauma
of freeway construction”
c.
Asserting community pride
4. Connection to Chicano Movement
a.
Background on Chicnano
movement and notion of aztlan
b.
Analysis of paintings – La Tierra
Mia
c.
Chicano Park Steering
committee pamphlet
5. How activists viewed chicano victory as local victory and part of
larger struggle at same time
a.
Analysis of Chicano park song
[DL1]Reword
ugly sentence
You are a great storyteller!
ReplyDeleteYour introduction is captivating, and flows very well.
As for your analysis of the song: it is interesting that you chose to start one of the final sections of your paper... I'm curious to see how your analysis of the song will change as you write the rest of your paper.
I am a little confused about whether or not you plan to write about the song right after your discussion of the historical context?
A few things to consider for your historical context:
Had residents tried to other means of resisting (other) threats to their community? Why was Chicano Park the 'breaking point'?
Were there any residents who opposed this 'civil disobedience'?
Did men and women respond in different ways to the Chicano movement and to the park takeover?